Ancure Endograft Device Claims are Preempted, Court Affirms



DOCUMENTS
  • Opinion


SAN JOSE, Calif. - Claims brought against the manufacturers of a recalled endograft device are preempted by the Medical Device Amendments because they called for requirements that are "different from or in addition to" those imposed by the Food and Drug Administration, a California appellate court has affirmed. Norks v. Endovascular Technologies Inc., No. H033941 (Calif. App., 6th Dist.).

On Nov. 19, the California Court of Appeal, 6th District, ruled that the investigational device exemption process through which the device was approved is similar to the rigorous premarket approval process referred to in Riegel v. Medtronic Inc. (552 U.S. 312).






UPCOMING CONFERENCES




HarrisMartin's Mass Tort Settlements Conference - Sponsored by Milestone

June 27, 2024 - Buffalo, NY
The Richardson Hotel Buffalo

MORE DETAILS



HarrisMartin's MDL Conference: Video Game Addiction and the Latest Mass Tort Updates

May 29, 2024 - Salt Lake City, UT
The Grand America Hotel

MORE DETAILS