Hip Replacement Device Claims are Preempted, Federal Judge Rules
November 23, 2010
DOCUMENTS
- Order
BOISE, Idaho - Claims brought against the maker of a hip replacement device are preempted by the Medical Device Amendments to the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act because the device is a Class III device that was subject to the Premarket Approval process, an Idaho federal judge has ruled. Cornwell v. Stryker Corp., et al., No. 10-66 (D. Idaho).
On Nov. 1, Judge Edward J. Lodge of the U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho dismissed the claims brought against Stryker Corp. and its subsidiaries.
Mabon Cornwell underwent a left total hip replacement on May 23, 2003, during which …
UPCOMING CONFERENCES
HarrisMartin's MDL Conference: Video Game Addiction and the Latest Mass Tort Updates
May 29, 2024 - Salt Lake City, UT
The Grand America Hotel
HarrisMartin's Mass Tort Settlements Conference - Sponsored by Milestone
June 27, 2024 - Buffalo, NY
The Richardson Hotel Buffalo