Penile Implant Case to Proceed Against Coloplast in Pa. Federal Court



DOCUMENTS
  • Order


PITTSBURGH — Negligence and strict liability claims asserted against Coloplast Corp. in a penile implant case are not preempted because the plaintiff has sufficiently alleged state law claims that parallel federal regulations, a Pennsylvania federal judge has ruled.

In a Sept. 18 order, Senior Judge David Cercone of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania further ruled that the plaintiff adequately alleged his breach of express warranty claim.

On May 6, 2015, Thomas Bowlen underwent implantation of Coloplast’s Titan penile implant device to help treat his erectile dysfunction.

The device consists of two cylinders and a …

FIRM NAMES
  • Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott
  • Morgan Lewis & Bockius
  • Robert Peirce & Associates





UPCOMING CONFERENCES




HarrisMartin's MDL Conference: Video Game Addiction and the Latest Mass Tort Updates

May 29, 2024 - Salt Lake City, UT
The Grand America Hotel

MORE DETAILS



HarrisMartin's Mass Tort Settlements Conference - Sponsored by Milestone

June 27, 2024 - Buffalo, NY
The Richardson Hotel Buffalo

MORE DETAILS