Medical Device Amendments Preempt Hip Implant Suit, Calif. Court Says



DOCUMENTS
  • Opinion


SAN FRANCISCO - A hip replacement device action brought against Stryker Orthopedics is preempted by the Medical Device Amendments because it seeks to impose regulations that are "different or in addition to" Food and Drug Administration requirements, a California federal judge has ruled. Rhynes v. Stryker Corp., et al., No. 10-5619 (N.D. Calif.).

On Oct. 27, Judge Samuel Conti of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California held that although the action is timely under the discovery rule, the plaintiff failed to allege violations of state law duties that parallel federal requirements.

In September 2010, Gloria Rhynes …






UPCOMING CONFERENCES




HarrisMartin's MDL Conference: Video Game Addiction and the Latest Mass Tort Updates

May 29, 2024 - Salt Lake City, UT
The Grand America Hotel

MORE DETAILS



HarrisMartin's Mass Tort Settlements Conference - Sponsored by Milestone

June 27, 2024 - Buffalo, NY
The Richardson Hotel Buffalo

MORE DETAILS