Testimony About Pulmosan H-30 Hood Creates Fact Issue, Judge Rules
August 6, 2008
DOCUMENTS
- Order
KANSAS CITY, Mo. - A state court judge has denied a motion for summary judgment filed by Pulmosan Safety Equipment Corp. in which the company argued that a sandblaster who said he wore a device that looked similar to one made by the company shouldn't be able to proceed with his claim on such a vague recollection. Hardy v. American Optical, et al., No. 0516-CV27381 (Mo. Cir. Ct., Jackson Cty.).
Judge John M. Torrence of the Jackson County Circuit Court ruled July 31 that genuine issues of material fact remain as to whether Pulmosan's H-30 Series Sandblast Hood was part …
UPCOMING CONFERENCES
HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference
January 10, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach