Clemco Wants Plaintiffs' Firm Sanctioned for Alleged Deposition Antics
April 29, 2008
DOCUMENTS
- Motion for Sanctions
OAKLAND, Calif. - Defendants in California want a silica plaintiff and his lawyers sanctioned for their conduct during a re-opened deposition that was scheduled after the plaintiff recognized several products that he failed to identify prior to his first deposition. Macias v. Lone Star Industries Inc., et al., No. RG 05-210491 (Calif. Super. Ct., Alameda Cty.).
Clemco Industries Corp. filed the motion April 22 in Alameda County Superior Court, accusing lawyers at the firm of Brent Coon & Associates of discovery abuses that included coaching their plaintiff and "outrageous and abusive conduct" that prolonged the second deposition and cost the …
UPCOMING CONFERENCES

HarrisMartin's Mass Tort Settlements Conference - Sponsored by Milestone
June 25, 2025 - Buffalo, NY
The Westin Buffalo

HarrisMartin's Justice for All Conference: Complex Litigation in Philadelphia's Evolving Legal Landscape
April 15, 2025 - Philadelphia, PA
The Logan Philadelphia