Plaintiff Challenges Sophisticated User, Says Sand is Dangerous Product
March 25, 2008
DOCUMENTS
- Opposition Briefs
NEW ORLEANS - A plaintiff who alleged that he developed silicosis from years of sandblasting throughout Louisiana has opposed defense efforts to have his case thrown out based on the sophisticated user doctrine, claiming his employer didn't know that silica was dangerous until at least 1994. Mullins, et al. v. Mississippi Valley Silica Co., et al., No. 2002-18069 (La. Dist. Ct., Orleans Parish).
Wardell Mullins argued in briefs filed March 5 in the Orleans Parish District Court that he had been sandblasting for 15 years before his employer became aware that exposure to dust from the trade could cause his …
UPCOMING CONFERENCES

HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference
April 08, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach

HarrisMartin's Mass Tort Settlements Conference - Sponsored by Milestone
June 25, 2025 - Buffalo, NY
The Westin Buffalo