Abrasive Product Couldn't Have Caused Plaintiff's Injury, Company Says



DOCUMENTS
  • Order on Summary Judgment
  • Settlement Statement


OAKLAND, Calif. - An abrasive blasting product manufacturer that recently lost its bid for summary judgment in a California silica case is re-asserting its position that the product allegedly responsible for causing the plaintiff's injury doesn't produce silica dust at all. McClarty v. Lone Star Industries Inc., et al., No. RG05-210545 (Calif. Super. Ct., Alameda Cty.).

In a statement filed Oct. 22 ahead of mandatory settlement conferences planned in the expedited Alameda County Superior Court case filed by Eugene McClarty, defendant CanAm Minerals argues that McClarty has failed to show that he was ever exposed to the company's product.

CanAm …






UPCOMING CONFERENCES




HarrisMartin's MDL Conference

December 04, 2024 - New York, NY
Virgin Hotels NYC

MORE DETAILS



HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference

January 10, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach

MORE DETAILS