Plaintiffs Fight Claims that Expert Reports Fail to Support Silica Case



DOCUMENTS
  • Motion to Exclude
  • Opposition


JOPLIN, Mo. - An attempt by several respirator defendants to have two plaintiffs' experts excluded based on reports that don't include enough information about the allegations should be denied as too severe a sanction, a response to the effort filed recently in Missouri's Western U.S. District Court says. Covey v. American Optical Corp., et al., No. 06-217 (W.D. Mo.).

Plaintiffs argue in a response brief filed Oct. 22 that the respirator defendants' attempts to have the expert reports stricken is disingenuous because the reports are sufficient under federal rules and provide the defendants and their prospective defense experts with enough …






UPCOMING CONFERENCES




HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference

April 08, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach

MORE DETAILS



HarrisMartin's Mass Tort Settlements Conference - Sponsored by Milestone

June 25, 2025 - Buffalo, NY
The Westin Buffalo

MORE DETAILS