California Plaintiffs in Upcoming Trial Oppose Dispositive Motions
October 23, 2007
DOCUMENTS
- Failure-to-Warn Motion
- Failure-to-Warn Opposition
- False Representation Motion
- False Representation Opposition
- Loss of Consortium Motion
- Loss of Consortium Opposition
- Overexposure Motion
- Overexposure Opposition
- Punitive Damages
- Punitive Damages Opposition
- Sophisticated User Motion
- Sophisticated User Opposition
OAKLAND, Calif. -- Plaintiffs whose welding fume claims are scheduled for an upcoming trial have opposed several dispositive motions filed by defendants, arguing that the defendants have failed to meet their burden of proof in asserting the motions. In re: Welding Products Cases, No. JCCP 004368; King, et al. v. BOC Financial Corp., et al., No. 429102 (Calif. Super. Ct., Alameda Cty.).
Plaintiffs Val and Patricia King, who, with a Nov. 19 trial date, are scheduled to be the first California plaintiffs to proceed to trial with welding fume claims, filed the series of opposition briefs Oct. 5 in the …
UPCOMING CONFERENCES
HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference
January 10, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach