Calif. Parties Disagree on Bay Bridge Welder Trial Settings



DOCUMENTS
  • Defense Brief
  • Plaintiffs' Brief
  • Proposals


OAKLAND, Calif. -- The parties involved in the coordinated California welding fume docket have filed briefs indicating that they disagree on the role the Bay Bridge welder plaintiffs play in the court's trial calendar, with the plaintiffs insisting that since these claimants make up the majority of the plaintiff pool, it is logical for those claims to be tried first. In re: Welding Products Cases, No. JCCP004368 (Calif. Super. Ct., Alameda Cty.).

However, the defendants told the Alameda County Superior Court that the myriad differences between each Bay Bridge welder preclude them from being tried together. On Dec. 15, both …






UPCOMING CONFERENCES




HarrisMartin's Mass Tort Settlements Conference - Sponsored by Milestone

June 25, 2025 - Buffalo, NY
The Westin Buffalo

MORE DETAILS



HarrisMartin's Justice for All Conference: Complex Litigation in Philadelphia's Evolving Legal Landscape

April 15, 2025 - Philadelphia, PA
The Logan Philadelphia

MORE DETAILS