Met Life Says it is an 'Improper Defendant,' Moves for Summary Judgment
April 25, 2006
DOCUMENTS
- Motion
- Notice of Supplemental Authority
CLEVELAND - In its recent omnibus motion for summary judgment, Metropolitan Life says it has erroneously been named as a defendant in the Welding Fume MDL because it is an insurance company, not a manufacturer of welding products. In re: Welding Fume Products Liability Litigation. MDL No. 1535. Case No. 1:03-cv-17000 (N.D. Ohio).
Met Life Insurance Co. says in its April 14 motion in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, that most of the MDL defendants are named because they allegedly designed, marketed, distributed, labeled or manufactured welding products the plaintiffs say they used. However, Met …
UPCOMING CONFERENCES
HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference
January 10, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach