Defendants: Plaintiffs Trying to 'Rewrite History'
December 13, 2005
CLEVELAND - The welding fume MDL defendants said the plaintiffs are trying 'rewrite history' by moving to compel documents they did not request in the last discovery hearing. In re: Welding Fume Products Liability Litigation. MDL No. 1535. Case No. 1:03-cv-17000 (N.D. Ohio).
On Dec. 7, the defendants opposed a plaintiffs' motion for an MDL evidentiary ruling and to compel documents from all defendants, accusing the plaintiffs of not 'checking their facts.' They said the same Airco documents were not admissible in the Ruth case because the plaintiffs failed to prove that Airco is a predecessor to ESAB.
'The …
UPCOMING CONFERENCES
HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference
January 10, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach