Judge Grants Suppliers' Sophisticated User Motions; 3M, Norton Motions Denied
August 3, 2005
DOCUMENTS
- 3M Opinion
- Ingersoll Rand Opinion
- Lockheed Martin Opinion
- Norton Opinion
- United Abrasives Opinion
- U.S. Silica Opinion
- Wedron Opinion
CLEVELAND - A state court judge in Ohio has awarded summary judgment to sand suppliers and an air compressor manufacturer named in a multi-plaintiff silica suit, finding that the defendants had no duty to warn of dangers associated with their products. In Re: Jackson Group I; Cuyahoga County Silicosis Cases, No. 469127 (Ohio Comm. Pls., Cuyahoga Cty.).
Judge Francis E. Sweeney of the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas issued the separate rulings Aug. 3, finding that the sophisticated user doctrine is available as a 'viable and legitimate defense' to silica-related personal injury claims asserted against defendants U.S. Silica, Wedron …
UPCOMING CONFERENCES
HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference
January 10, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach