Welding Rod MDL Defendant Asserts Successor Non-Liability in Dismissal Motion
February 26, 2004
DOCUMENTS
- Motion
CLEVELAND -- A company that is named as a defendant in the welding rod litigation as a result of it acquisition of a small welding rod distributor has filed a motion in the MDL arguing that it should be dismissed from all remaining cases under Ohio's successor non-liability law. In re Welding Rod Products Liability Litigation, MDL 1535 (N.D. Ohio).
J.W. Harris filed the motion Jan. 12 in U.S. District Court for the Northern District Court of Ohio, claiming that plaintiffs who named the company in their personal injury complaints stemming from exposure to welding rods have failed to plead …
UPCOMING CONFERENCES
HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference
January 10, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach