Parties Spar over Admissibility of Plaintiff Experts in California
October 4, 2007
DOCUMENTS
- Cunitz Motion
- Cunitz Reply
- Cunitz Response
- Parent Motion
- Parent Reply
- Parent Response
- Sanchez-Ramos Motion
- Sanchez-Ramos Reply
- Sanchez-Ramos Response
- Zimmerman Motion
- Zimmerman Reply
- Zimmerman Response
OAKLAND, Calif. -- The parties in an upcoming California welding fume trial continue to battle over the admissibility of expert testimony proffered by the plaintiffs, with the defendants reasserting their position that the experts' testimony falls short of California's admissibility standards. In re: Welding Products Cases, JCCP No. 004368 (Calif. Super. Ct., Alameda Cty.); King, et al. v. BOC Group, et al., No. 04-429012 (Calif. Super. Ct., San Francisco Cty.).
The plaintiffs filed responses on Sept. 24 and 25 in the Alameda County Superior Court, asking the court to deny motions challenging the testimony of Robert J. Cunitz, Ph.D., Juan …
UPCOMING CONFERENCES
HarrisMartin's Justice for All Conference: Complex Litigation in Philadelphia's Evolving Legal Landscape
April 15, 2025 - Philadelphia, PA
The Logan Philadelphia
