Parties Spar over Admissibility of Plaintiff Experts in California

October 4, 2007

DOCUMENTS

Cunitz Motion
Cunitz Reply
Cunitz Response
Parent Motion
Parent Reply
Parent Response
Sanchez-Ramos Motion
Sanchez-Ramos Reply
Sanchez-Ramos Response
Zimmerman Motion
Zimmerman Reply
Zimmerman Response

OAKLAND, Calif. -- The parties in an upcoming California welding fume trial continue to battle over the admissibility of expert testimony proffered by the plaintiffs, with the defendants reasserting their position that the experts' testimony falls short of California's admissibility standards. In re: Welding Products Cases, JCCP No. 004368 (Calif. Super. Ct., Alameda Cty.); King, et al. v. BOC Group, et al., No. 04-429012 (Calif. Super. Ct., San Francisco Cty.).

The plaintiffs filed responses on Sept. 24 and 25 in the Alameda County Superior Court, asking the court to deny motions challenging the testimony of Robert J. Cunitz, Ph.D., Juan …

Subscribe Now Purchase Article for $40.00

UPCOMING CONFERENCES

HarrisMartin's MDL Conference

December 04, 2024 - New York, NY

Virgin Hotels NYC

MORE DETAILS

HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference

January 10, 2025 - Long Beach, CA