Plaintiff, Unimin and Supplier at Odds over Duty to Warn in N.D. Silica Case



DOCUMENTS
  • Plaintiff's Opposition
  • Summary Judgment Motion
  • Unimin Brief


FARGO, N.D. - A former North Dakota sandblaster has opposed a motion for summary judgment by the company that supplied silica to his employer, arguing that the supplier failed to provide adequate warnings on the product, which it allegedly repackaged after receiving it from Unimin Corp. Waclawik v. Aearo Company, et al., No. 09-08-C-4010 (N.D. Dist. Ct., Cass Cty.).

Jim Waclawik says in an Oct. 15 opposition brief filed in Cass County District Court that Bladholm Brothers Culvert Co.'s owed him a common law duty to warn of risks associated with its silica and that the company specifically sold it …






UPCOMING CONFERENCES




HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference

January 10, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach

MORE DETAILS



HarrisMartin's MDL Conference

December 04, 2024 - New York, NY
Virgin Hotels NYC

MORE DETAILS