3M: No Confusion in Missouri Plaintiff's Silica Injury Diagnosis




ST. LOUIS, Mo. - A silica plaintiff who said he was confused about whether he suffered from silicosis because his treating doctors disagreed over the diagnosis cannot use his uncertainty as a reason for waiting too long to file a complaint, defendant 3M says in court papers filed recently in Missouri. Midkiff, et al. v. 3M Co., et al., No. 08-1221 (E.D. Mo.).

3M said in a Jan. 12 reply brief supporting its motion for summary judgment on statute of limitations grounds that just because doctors were at odds over whether plaintiff David Midkiff had silicosis, the plaintiff was capable …






UPCOMING CONFERENCES




HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference

January 10, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach

MORE DETAILS



HarrisMartin's MDL Conference

December 04, 2024 - New York, NY
Virgin Hotels NYC

MORE DETAILS