Sand Suppliers Urge Appeals Court to Revisit Duty Issue
June 19, 2009
DOCUMENTS
- Motion
ROCHESTER, N.Y. - Defendants have moved for reconsideration of an appeals court ruling that rejected their sophisticated intermediary defense and reinstated the claims of two men who allegedly developed silicosis after nearly 20 years of dust exposure. Rickicki v. Borden Chemical, et al., No. CA 07-01668 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., App. Div., 4th Dept.).
Defendants Unimin Corp. and U.S. Silica Co. filed the motion to reargue the case June 8 in New York's Fourth Appellate Division, the same court that in March reversed a trial court ruling that the plaintiffs' employers, as sophisticated intermediaries and purchasers of silica, were in the …
UPCOMING CONFERENCES
HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference
January 10, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach