Merck Seeks to Vacate Ernst Verdict, Says Plaintiff Relied on 'Junk Science'



DOCUMENTS
  • Motion


ANGLETON, Texas - Merck & Co. Inc. has filed a motion to set aside a Texas jury's $253.4 million verdict in the first-ever Vioxx trial and to enter a take-nothing judgment in the drug manufacturer's favor, claiming that the verdict was based on so-called 'junk science' and other legally insufficient evidence. Ernst, et al. v. Merck & Co. Inc., et al., No. 19961*BH02 (Texas 23rd Dist. Ct., Brazoria Cty.).

The April 24 motion, filed in Brazoria County's 23rd District Court, states that plaintiff Carol Ernst offered only speculative theories as to how her husband's short-term use of Vioxx caused or …






UPCOMING CONFERENCES




HarrisMartin's MDL Conference

March 26, 2025 - Charlotte, NC
Omni Charlotte Hotel

MORE DETAILS



HarrisMartin's Webinar Series: Water Contamination Litigation Presented by EisnerAmper

May 06, 2025

MORE DETAILS