Plaintiffs Urge Court Not to Revisit Disqualified Judge's Vioxx Rulings



DOCUMENTS
  • Opposition Brief


LOS ANGELES - A forum decision issued by a Vioxx judge who was later disqualified for failing to disclose that he once took the drug should not be reconsidered in light of the disqualification and other circumstances that have arisen since the ruling, a brief filed recently by plaintiffs in California says. In Re Vioxx Cases, JCCP No. 4247 (Calif. Super. Ct., Los Angeles Cty.).

Plaintiffs filed the brief Dec. 22 in Los Angeles County Superior Court, opposing Merck & Co. Inc.'s effort to overturn the judge's two-year-old decision that allowed two out-of-state plaintiffs to proceed with their Vioxx claims …






UPCOMING CONFERENCES




HarrisMartin's Mass Tort Settlements Conference - Sponsored by Milestone

June 25, 2025 - Buffalo, NY
The Westin Buffalo

MORE DETAILS



HarrisMartin's Webinar Series: Water Contamination Litigation Presented by EisnerAmper

May 06, 2025

MORE DETAILS