Merck Says 18-Month APPROVe Testimony Should be Heard
November 11, 2005
DOCUMENTS
- Response
NEW ORLEANS - Merck & Co. has responded to a motion to exclude testimony that Vioxx cannot cause adverse cardiac events in patients who took the drug for less than 18 months, arguing the evidence is needed to contradict allegations that short-term Vioxx use caused a Florida man's Vioxx-related heart attack. Plunkett v. Merck & Co. Inc., No. 05-4046 (E.D. La.).
Merck's response, filed Nov. 2 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, includes numerous reasons for why the court should deny a plaintiff's motion to exclude the threshold evidence, which was developed from post hoc …
UPCOMING CONFERENCES

HarrisMartin's Mass Tort Settlements Conference - Sponsored by Milestone
June 25, 2025 - Buffalo, NY
The Westin Buffalo