California Plaintiffs: Merck Waited Too Long to Seek Recusal of Vioxx Judge
April 6, 2005
DOCUMENTS
- Brief
LOS ANGELES - Plaintiffs opposing an appeals court decision to remove a California trial court judge from the state's consolidated Vioxx docket argued in a brief filed recently that Merck waited too long to seek the judge's recusal for failing to disclose that he once took the arthritis drug. Merck & Co., Inc. v. S.C.L.A., et al., No. B180613 (Calif. Ct. App., 2nd Dist.).
In a Feb. 14 response to the Second District Court of Appeal's Feb. 2 order recusing Judge Peter D. Lichtman, plaintiffs contend that the Los Angeles Superior Court judge disclosed his past use of Vioxx to …
UPCOMING CONFERENCES

HarrisMartin's Data Breach Litigation Conference
March 26, 2025 - Charlotte, NC
Omni Charlotte Hotel