Appeals Court Affirms PPA Defense Verdict, Evidentiary Rulings
March 9, 2007
DOCUMENTS
- Opinion
LOS ANGELES - An appeals court in California has upheld defense verdicts in two PPA cases after plaintiffs argued that the trial judge gave inadequate instructions to jurors and refused to allow into evidence pertinent testimony related to the FDA's decision to recommend removal of the pharmaceutical ingredient from the market. O'Neill, et al. v. Novartis Consumer Health Inc., No. B174512 (Calif. Ct. App., 2nd Dist.).
In an opinion issued Feb. 27, the Second District California Court of Appeal held that the trial court judge did not err when he refused to instruct jurors in the PPA trial that compliance …
UPCOMING CONFERENCES

HarrisMartin's Mass Tort Settlements Conference - Sponsored by Milestone
June 25, 2025 - Buffalo, NY
The Westin Buffalo

HarrisMartin's Justice for All Conference: Complex Litigation in Philadelphia's Evolving Legal Landscape
April 15, 2025 - Philadelphia, PA
The Logan Philadelphia