D.C. Judges Affirm Summary Judgment Award to FDA
June 19, 2006
DOCUMENTS
- Opinion
WASHINGTON, D.C. - A three-judge panel in the D.C. Court of Appeals has affirmed in part a lower court's order granting summary judgment to the FDA, finding that although the agency's court-ordered RU-486 document production was vague, it was structurally intact. Judicial Watch Inc. v. Food and Drug Administration, et al. No. 05-5256 (U.S. Ct. App., D.C. Cir.).
Judges David B. Henderson, Karen L. Sentelle and Merrick B. Garland issued their opinion June 2, stating that although the FDA's index describing the documents it withheld from Judicial Watch Inc. - which touts itself as seeking "to ensure that political and …
UPCOMING CONFERENCES
HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference
January 10, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach