Ala. Plaintiff Can Pursue Claims Against Merck Sales Reps, Judge Remands Case



DOCUMENTS
  • Opinion


BIRMINGHAM, Ala. - A suit filed by a woman who claims that Merck employees failed to adequately warn her physician of the dangers of Vioxx was remanded to state court after a federal judge found that the Alabama Supreme Court has never addressed whether individual sales representatives can be held liable on claims under the Alabama Extended Manufacturer's Liability Doctrine (AEMLD). Lavaughn Hales v. Merck & Co., Inc., et al., No. 03-AR-1028-M (N.D. Ala.).

In rendering his decision, U.S. District Judge William M. Acker, Jr., opined that the plaintiff's claims against Merck's Alabama employees should not merge into a single …






UPCOMING CONFERENCES




HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference

January 10, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach

MORE DETAILS



HarrisMartin's MDL Conference

December 04, 2024 - New York, NY
Virgin Hotels NYC

MORE DETAILS