Expert Testimony Deemed Unreliable in Propulsid Case



DOCUMENTS
  • Order


NEW ORLEANS - A federal judge awarded summary judgment to the manufacturer of Propulsid after ruling that the opinions of the plaintiff's expert witnesses regarding the drug's ability to cause injury did not meet the standards established under Daubert. Dorita Black, et al., v. Johnson & Johnson, et al., and only regarding Plaintiff, Ernestine Brock, No. 00-2497 (E.D. La.).

U.S. District Judge Eldon E. Fallon's April 29 decision stated that the testimony proffered by Dr. William Shell and Dr. Dwain Eckberg was unreliable because the doctors failed to support their theories that Propulsid caused plaintiff Ernestine Brock to suffer a …






UPCOMING CONFERENCES




HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference

January 10, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach

MORE DETAILS



HarrisMartin's MDL Conference

December 04, 2024 - New York, NY
Virgin Hotels NYC

MORE DETAILS