Pa. Has Jurisdiction Over Contaminated Endoscope Case, Appellate Court Rules



DOCUMENTS
  • Opinion


PHILADELPHIA — Pennsylvania courts have jurisdiction over a case involving contaminated duodenoscope, an appellate court has ruled, finding that although the device was used in North Carolina and manufactured by a Japanese corporation, the co-defendants engaged in significant conduct in Pennsylvania.

In an April 10 published opinion, the Pennsylvania Superior Court further ruled that the trial court erred in dismissed the claims on the basis of forum non conveniens because there were no “weighty reasons” for disturbing the plaintiff’s choice of forum.

Janice Vaughan underwent medical procedures in North Carolina, during which physicians used an Olympus TJF-Q180V duodenoscope. The scope …

FIRM NAMES
  • Cipriani & Werner
  • Kolsby, Gordon, Robin, & Shore
  • Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin
  • McGuire Woods
  • Panish Shea & Boyle





UPCOMING CONFERENCES




HarrisMartin's Webinar Series: Water Contamination Litigation Presented by EisnerAmper

May 06, 2025

MORE DETAILS



HarrisMartin's MDL Conference

May 28, 2025 - Washington, DC
Washington DC Hotel Information Coming Soon!

MORE DETAILS