BHR Hip Implant Plaintiffs Seek to Add Smith & Nephew plc as Defendant
June 4, 2018
DOCUMENTS
- Reply
BALTIMORE — A couple is urging a Maryland federal judge to amend their complaint involving a BHR hip implant component to add Smith & Nephew plc as a defendant, arguing the United Kingdom-based holding company is an indispensable party.
In a May 25 reply filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland, plaintiffs further maintain that even though their case was made part of the BHR multidistrict litigation, they are not prohibited from bringing claims against additional defendants.
According to a complaint originally filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Ronald Cox …
FIRM NAMES
- Dykema Gossett
- Irwin Fritchie Urquhart & Moore
- Sidley Austin
- SIdley Austin
UPCOMING CONFERENCES
HarrisMartin's New Jersey Asbestos Litigation Conference
February 27, 2025 - New Brunswick, NJ
Hyatt Regency New Brunswick
HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference
January 10, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach