Smith & Nephew Opposes Proposed Amended Complaint in BHR Hip Component Case



DOCUMENTS
  • Motion
  • Response


BALTIMORE — Smith & Nephew Inc. has opposed a couple’s request to amend their complaint involving a BHR hip implant component to add Smith & Nephew plc as a defendant, arguing the holding company is not involved in the manufacture and marketing of the component.

In a May 21 response filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland, Smith & Nephew Inc. further argues that plaintiffs’ proposed amendments are futile because they seek to assert claims that had already been dismissed by the multidistrict litigation court.

According to a complaint originally filed in the U.S. District Court …

FIRM NAMES
  • Burch George & Germany
  • Sidley Austin





UPCOMING CONFERENCES




HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference

January 10, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach

MORE DETAILS



HarrisMartin's New Jersey Asbestos Litigation Conference

February 27, 2025 - New Brunswick, NJ
Hyatt Regency New Brunswick

MORE DETAILS