M2a Hip Plaintiffs Oppose Biomet’s Bid for Summary Judgment on Statute of Repose Issue



DOCUMENTS
  • Opposition


SOUTH BEND, Ind. — Plaintiffs in the M2a Magnum Hip Implant MDL argue that Biomet’s motions for summary judgment on statue of repose grounds is defeated by the exception for latent injury diseases because the manufacturer fraudulently concealed the dangers of metallosis.

In a May 25 opposition filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, plaintiffs argued that Biomet’s eight motions must be denied because plaintiffs’ injuries arise from latent defects in their metal-on-metal hip implant devices, and that those injuries manifested after years of device articulation.

North Carolina law contains an exception to the statute …

FIRM NAMES
  • Beasley Allen Crow Methvin
  • Fisher Boyd Johnson & Hugenard
  • Gomez Trial Attorneys
  • Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhard & Shipley





UPCOMING CONFERENCES




HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference

January 10, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach

MORE DETAILS



HarrisMartin's New Jersey Asbestos Litigation Conference

February 27, 2025 - New Brunswick, NJ
Hyatt Regency New Brunswick

MORE DETAILS