Merck Asks High Court to Review Reinstatement of Failure-To-Warn Claims in Fosamax MDL
September 6, 2017
DOCUMENTS
- 3rd Circuit Ruling
PHILADELPHIA — Merck has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review a federal appeals court’s reinstatement of failure-to-warn claims in the Fosamax MDL, arguing the claims are preempted because the Food and Drug Administration would not have approved enhanced warnings to the label.
In filing a petition for certiorari on Aug. 22, Merck seeks to challenge the 3rd Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals’ determination that the preemption issue is factual and cannot be resolved on a motion for summary judgment.
The appellate court held that under the “clear evidence” standard set forth in Wyeth v. Levine, the factfinder must conclude …
FIRM NAMES
- Carella Byrne Cecchi Olstein Brody & Agnello
- Fox Rothschild
- Hughes Hubbard & Reed
- Kellogg Hansen Todd Figel & Frederick
- King & Spalding
- Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom
- Venable
- Weitz & Luxenberg
UPCOMING CONFERENCES
HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference
January 10, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach