Del. Pradaxa Action Dismissed As Untimely Pursuant to Borrowing Statute
July 5, 2017
DOCUMENTS
- Order
WILMINGTON, Del. — A Delaware judge has dismissed a Pradaxa injury action as untimely, ruling that the state’s two-year statute of limitations applies to the out-of-state’s plaintiff’s claims via Delaware’s Borrowing Statute.
On June 29, Judge Eric M. Davis of the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware further held that the limitations period was not tolled by fraudulent concealment because the plaintiff did not specify how Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. misrepresented the efficacy of Pradaxa.
Mirek Machala, a Washington D.C. resident, began taking Pradaxa on Jan. 1, 2013, to treat his atrial fibrillation. He suffered a stroke on …
FIRM NAMES
- Butler Snow
- McCarter & English
- Napoli Shkolnik
UPCOMING CONFERENCES
HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference
January 10, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach