U.S. Supreme Court Declines to Review N.J. Preemption Ruling
April 4, 2017
WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. Supreme Court has declined to review a New Jersey high court’s ruling that claims based upon generic drug makers' failure to adopt changes made to the brand name drug’s warnings are not preempted.
On April 3, the high court denied the generic drug manufacturers’ petition for certiorari. The drug makers sought to challenge the New Jersey Supreme Court’s finding that it was not impossible for the generic drug makers to comply with both federal and state law in incorporating the label changes.
In an Aug. 22 opinion, the New Jersey court explained that no …
FIRM NAMES
- Center for Constitutional Litigation
- Goldberg Segalla
- Goodwin Procter
- Harris Beach
- Kirkland & Ellis
- Oshman & Mirisola
- Ulmer & Berne
UPCOMING CONFERENCES
HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference
January 10, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach