N.M. Federal Judge Remands Essure Action for Lack of Federal Question
December 12, 2016
DOCUMENTS
- Order
ALBUQUERQUE, NM — A New Mexico federal judge has remanded an Essure case to state court, ruling that the action does not present a federal question essential to the resolution of the plaintiffs’ claims, which are grounded in state law.
Judge William P. Johnson of the U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico further ruled that resolving the case in a federal court would disrupt the federal-state balance because Congress did not create an exclusively federal cause of action, even in cases under the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act.
Danielle Romero underwent implantation of the Bayer Essure device …
FIRM NAMES
- Joel T. Newton
- Modrall Sperling Roehl Harris & Sisk
- Sidley Austin
UPCOMING CONFERENCES
HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference
January 10, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach