N.J. Appeals Court Reverses $25 Million Verdict in Accutane Case



DOCUMENTS
  • Opinion


TRENTON, N.J. — A New Jersey appellate court has reversed a $25 million plaintiff’s verdict rendered in an Accutane case, ruling that the case was untimely under Alabama’s two-year statute of limitations.

On Aug. 11, the New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division, held that the trial court incorrectly applied New Jersey law, which provides for equitable tolling of the statute of limitations, because the case has a more significant relationship with Alabama.

Alabama resident Andrew McCarrell sued Hoffman-La Roche, alleging that he developed inflammatory bowel disease as a result of taking Accutane when he was in his early 20s. Shortly …

FIRM NAMES
  • Beggs & Lane
  • Covington & Burling
  • Hook & Bolton
  • Seeger Weiss





UPCOMING CONFERENCES




HarrisMartin's Webinar Series: Depo-Provera CI Litigation

November 04, 2024

MORE DETAILS



HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference

January 10, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach

MORE DETAILS