Parties Dispute Jury Instructions as to Apportionment of Fault in Calif. Transvaginal Mesh Action
May 5, 2015
DOCUMENTS
- Brief
LOS ANGELES — Parties in a California transvaginal mesh action are disputing jury instructions regarding the apportionment of fault to the plaintiff’s implanting surgeon.
In an April 22 filing, the parties disputed two jury instructions regarding the apportionment of fault to Sanchez’s implanting surgeon, Dr. Kerri Wiltchik. BSC asserts the instructions are proper because it may present evidence at trial that the surgeon was negligent. The plaintiff, however, argues that BSC has presented no evidence that Dr. Wiltchik was negligent and therefore the instruction should not be given.
Trial began on May 5 in the U.S. District Court for the …
FIRM NAMES
- Andrus & Wagstaff
- Clark Love & Hutson
- Flaherty Sensabaugh & Bonasso
- Laminack Pirtle & Martines
- Perdue Kidd & Vickery
- Shook Hardy & Bacon
- The Potts Law Firm
UPCOMING CONFERENCES
HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference
January 10, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach
HarrisMartin's New Jersey Asbestos Litigation Conference
February 27, 2025 - New Brunswick, NJ
Hyatt Regency New Brunswick