Calif. High Court to Review Question of State Court Jurisdiction Over Non-Residents’ Claims in Plavix Coordinated Proceeding
November 21, 2014
SAN FRANCISCO — The California Supreme Court has agreed to review the question of whether a state court has jurisdiction over claims brought by non-residents against Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. in a Plavix coordinated proceeding where the drug maker has engaged in substantial, continuous activity in California.
The high court granted BMS’s petition for review on Nov. 19. BMS is challenging a July ruling by the California Court of Appeal, 1st District, which found that the drug maker’s activity is substantially connected to claims by non-residents, which are based on the same alleged wrongdoing as those alleged by resident plaintiffs.
BMS …
FIRM NAMES
- Arnold & Porter
- Audet & Partners
- Howard Rice Nemerovski Canady Falk & Rabkin
- Napoli Bern Ripka Shkolnik
UPCOMING CONFERENCES

HarrisMartin's Justice for All Conference: Complex Litigation in Philadelphia's Evolving Legal Landscape
April 15, 2025 - Philadelphia, PA
The Logan Philadelphia