Off-Label Promotion Claims in Medtronic Infuse Case Not Preempted, Md. Appeals Court Rules
October 7, 2014
DOCUMENTS
- Opinion
BALTIMORE — Federal law does not preempt claims based on false statements allegedly made by Medtronic in its off-label promotion of the Infuse Bone Graft device, a Maryland appeals court has ruled in reinstating fraud, negligent misrepresentation and consumer protection act claims against the manufacturer.
In an Oct. 6 opinion, the Maryland Court of Special appeals also reversed a lower court’s ruling that federal law preempts claims for breach of express warranties Medtronic may have made in voluntary communications with the public or members of the medical professions outside of the context of the device’s FDA-approved labeling.
In 2007, Steven …
FIRM NAMES
- Baum Hedlund Aristei & Goldman
- Dugan Babij & Tolley
- Hogan Lovells
- Mayer Brown
UPCOMING CONFERENCES
HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference
January 10, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach