8th Circuit Reinstates Contaminated Baby Formula Case, Says Expert Testimony Should be Admitted
June 10, 2014
DOCUMENTS
- Opinion
MINNEAPOLIS — A trial court abused its discretion in excluding a plaintiff’s experts in a contaminated baby formula case, a federal appeals court has ruled, finding that the experts’ methodology was scientifically valid, could properly be applied to the facts of this case, and was therefore reliable.
On June 6, the 8th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals reversed the lower court’s grant of summary judgment to Mead Johnson & Co. and remanded the case to the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota.
H.T.P. was born on May 4, 2005. While in the hospital, he was fed a sterile …
FIRM NAMES
- Leonard Street & Deinard
- Lommen Abdo Cole King & Stageberg
- Patrick Beard Schulman & Jacoway
- Sedgwick
UPCOMING CONFERENCES
HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference
January 10, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach