N.C. Federal Judge Finds Expert Opinions in Contaminated Baby Formula Case ‘Scientifically Valid’



DOCUMENTS
  • Order


ASHEVILLE, N.C. — A North Carolina federal judge has denied Abbott Laboratories’ motion to exclude certain expert opinions in a contaminated infant formula case, finding the plaintiff’s experts are qualified to opine on the issues of the relevant standards of care, alleged defect and causation.

On Feb. 10, Judge Martin Reidinger of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina held that the experts’ reasoning and methodology are scientifically valid.

Kimberly S. Sisk sued Abbott Laboratories, alleging her minor son developed meningitis as a result of consuming Abbott’s contaminated powdered infant formula. The second amended complaint lists …

FIRM NAMES
  • Jones Day
  • Lommen Abdo Cole King & Stageberg
  • McGuire Wood & Bissette
  • Roberts & Stevens





UPCOMING CONFERENCES




HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference

January 10, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach

MORE DETAILS



HarrisMartin's MDL Conference

December 04, 2024 - New York, NY
Virgin Hotels NYC

MORE DETAILS