Majority of Claims Survive Preemption in Medtronic Infuse Case, Ore. Federal Judge Rules



DOCUMENTS
  • Order


PORTLAND, Ore. — Failure-to-warn, fraud, negligence and warranty claims brought against Medtronic Inc. in connection with its off-label promotion of its Infuse bone grafting device are not preempted because they do not seek to impose device-specific duties different from, or in addition to, the manufacturer's duties under federal law, an Oregon federal magistrate judge has ruled.

However, in the Sept. 6, order, Magistrate Judge Paul Papak of the District of Oregon found the plaintiff’s design defect claim is preempted because it seeks to impose requirements in addition to those mandated by the Food and Drug Administration.

On March 11, Richard …

FIRM NAMES
  • Gaylord Eyerman Bradley
  • Gordon & Rees
  • Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein
  • Reed Smith





UPCOMING CONFERENCES




HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference

January 10, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach

MORE DETAILS



HarrisMartin's New Jersey Asbestos Litigation Conference

February 27, 2025 - New Brunswick, NJ
Hyatt Regency New Brunswick

MORE DETAILS