Claims in HRT Drugs Case Timely, Ariz. Federal Judge Rules
May 6, 2013
DOCUMENTS
- Order
PHOENIX — An Arizona federal judge has allowed the pro se plaintiff in a hormone therapy replacement case to proceed with her claim of negligence and replead her failure-to-warn and fraud claims, finding she could not have known or discovered with reasonable diligence that the drugs were a potential cause of her breast cancer until October 2010.
In a May 3 order, Judge David G. Campbell of the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona rejected the defendant drug makers’ assertion that the plaintiff should have known of the potential cause of her injury when the Women’s Health Initiative …
FIRM NAMES
- Snell & Wilmer
UPCOMING CONFERENCES
HarrisMartin's MDL Conference: Depo-Provera and Current MDL Cases
January 29, 2025 - Miami Beach, FL
The Coral Ballroom at the Fontainebleau Miami Beach
HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference
January 10, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach