Claims Against Drug Makers Barred by Product Identification, Preemption, Iowa Court Affirms
April 30, 2013
DOCUMENTS
- Opinion
DES MOINES, Iowa — Failure-to-warn claims brought against the makers of Reglan are barred under Iowa law because the plaintiff only ingested the drug’s generic equivalent, the Iowa Court of Appeals has affirmed.
On April 24, the appellate court further held that the plaintiff’s claims against the makers of the generic drug are preempted under PLIVA Inc. v. Mensing.
Theresa Huck was prescribed Reglan on Feb. 11, 2004, and took the drug until March 2006. All of her prescriptions were filled with the drug’s generic equivalent, metoclopramide, manufactured by PLIVA Inc.
Reglan’s 2002 labeling included a warning that use of …
FIRM NAMES
- Bradley Arant Boult & Cummings
- Eich, Van Dyke & Weden
- Lederer Weston Craig
- Mayer Brown
- McGlynn Glisson & Mouton
- Nyemaster, Goode, West, Hansell & O'Brien
- Ulmer & Berne
UPCOMING CONFERENCES
HarrisMartin's MDL Conference: Depo-Provera and Current MDL Cases
January 29, 2025 - Miami Beach, FL
The Coral Ballroom at the Fontainebleau Miami Beach
HarrisMartin's New Jersey Asbestos Litigation Conference
February 27, 2025 - New Brunswick, NJ
Hyatt Regency New Brunswick