Okla. Supreme Court Allows Sulzer Knee Plaintiff’s Negligence Per Se Claim Alleging FDCA Violations
March 20, 2013
DOCUMENTS
- Majority Opinion and Dissent
OKLAHOMA CITY — The Oklahoma Supreme Court has ruled 6-3 that the Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act does not prevent the recipient of a Sulzer Orthopedics knee implant from bringing a negligence per se claim alleging violations of that act’s Medical Device Amendments.
The high court’s March 19 majority opinion came in response to a single question posed by the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, which is considering an appeal by Brian C. Howard, M.D., who alleges defects in a knee replacement device manufactured by Sulzer Orthopedics Inc.
The high court said it was not asked to conduct …
FIRM NAMES
- Best & Sharp
- McAffee & Taft
- Shook Hardy & Bacon
UPCOMING CONFERENCES
HarrisMartin's New Jersey Asbestos Litigation Conference
February 27, 2025 - New Brunswick, NJ
Hyatt Regency New Brunswick
HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference
January 10, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach