Failure-To-Warn Claims Against Generic Reglan Makers Preempted, 5th Cir. Affirms



DOCUMENTS
  • Opinion


NEW ORLEANS – A failure-to-warn suit brought against the makers of generic Reglan is federally preempted pursuant to PLIVA Inc. v. Mensing, the 5th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals has affirmed.

On Feb. 14, the appellate court rejected the plaintiff's argument that Mensing does not preempt her claim that the generic manufacturers failed to incorporate a 2004 labeling change for Reglan. Plaintiffs alleged the 2004 revision was inadequate, the appellate court explained, therefore the claim is preempted.

After taking generic Reglan for two years, Penny Morris allegedly developed tardive dyskinesia. She sued the makers of metoclopramide, Actavis Elizabeth LLC, Teva …

FIRM NAMES
  • Curtis Law Group
  • Goodwin Procter
  • Law Offices of Ossie Brown
  • Lemle & Kelleher
  • Mayer Smith & Roberts
  • McGlynn Glisson & Mouton
  • Miller Curtis & Weisbrod
  • Ulmer & Berne





UPCOMING CONFERENCES




HarrisMartin's Justice for All Conference: Complex Litigation in Philadelphia's Evolving Legal Landscape

April 15, 2025 - Philadelphia, PA
The Logan Philadelphia

MORE DETAILS



HarrisMartin's Webinar Series: Water Contamination Litigation Presented by EisnerAmper

May 06, 2025

MORE DETAILS