Failure-To-Warn, Strict Liability Claims Survive in Intraoral Distraction Device Case



DOCUMENTS
  • Complaint
  • Order


KANSAS CITY, Mo. - A Missouri federal judge has denied the manufacturer of a mechanical intraoral distraction device summary judgment on failure-to-warn and strict liability claims, ruling that issues of fact exist as to whether the surgeon followed the manufacturer's instructions when implanting the device. Cox v. KLS Martin, No. 10-1204 (W.D. Mo.).

However, in the Feb. 27 order, Judge Ortrie D. Smith of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri granted KLS summary judgment on the breach of implied warranty claim, ruling that plaintiffs failed to establish reliance.

Jeremiah Cox was born with a severe case …






UPCOMING CONFERENCES




HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference

April 08, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach

MORE DETAILS



HarrisMartin's Justice for All Conference: Complex Litigation in Philadelphia's Evolving Legal Landscape

April 15, 2025 - Philadelphia, PA
The Logan Philadelphia

MORE DETAILS