Stryker Hip Replacement Action Preempted by MDA, Judge Rules



DOCUMENTS
  • Order


SAN FRANCISCO - A hip replacement device action brought against Stryker Orthopedics is preempted by the Medical Device Amendments because it seeks to impose regulations that are "different or in addition to" Food and Drug Administration requirements, a California federal judge has ruled. Rhynes v. Stryker Corp., et al., No. 10-5619 (N.D. Calif.).

On Oct. 27, Judge Samuel Conti of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California held that although the action is timely under the discovery rule, the plaintiff failed to allege violations of state law duties that parallel federal requirements.

In September 2010, Gloria Rhynes …






UPCOMING CONFERENCES




HarrisMartin's New Jersey Asbestos Litigation Conference

February 27, 2025 - New Brunswick, NJ
Hyatt Regency New Brunswick

MORE DETAILS



HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference

January 10, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach

MORE DETAILS