Negligence Per Se Claim Preempted in Knee Replacement Suit, Court Rules



DOCUMENTS
  • Order


TULSA, Okla. - A negligence per se claim brought against the manufacturer of a knee replacement device is federally preempted because it seeks to enforce or restrain violations of the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, an Oklahoma federal judge has ruled. Howard v. Sulzer Orthopedics Inc., et al., No. 02-564 (N.D. Okla.).

On June 21, Chief Judge Claire V. Eagan of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma determined that Oklahoma state courts would find that the FDCA was intended to protect the public at large, rather than individuals.

Brian Howard received a Sulzer Natural Knee II …






UPCOMING CONFERENCES




HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference

January 10, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach

MORE DETAILS



HarrisMartin's New Jersey Asbestos Litigation Conference

February 27, 2025 - New Brunswick, NJ
Hyatt Regency New Brunswick

MORE DETAILS