Claims Against Clinical Research Defendants Dismissed in Raptiva Case
June 16, 2011
DOCUMENTS
- Order
DALLAS - A Texas federal judge has refused to remand to state court a Raptiva injury suit, ruling that the non-diverse clinical research defendants were improperly joined because the claims against them fail as a matter of law. McCall v. Genentech Inc., et al., No. 10-1747-B (N.D. Texas).
On June 9, Judge Jane J. Boyle of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas ruled that the plaintiff's negligence claims against a clinical researcher fail because the researcher owed no duty to the plaintiff under Texas law.
Mabel McCall alleges that Dr. Alan Menter prescribed Raptiva to treat …
UPCOMING CONFERENCES
HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference
January 10, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach
HarrisMartin's New Jersey Asbestos Litigation Conference
February 27, 2025 - New Brunswick, NJ
Hyatt Regency New Brunswick